Skip to content
October 4, 2015 / compassioninpolitics

How can you answer the Foucault/Biopower critique

1) Fear good

2) Realism good/Security good

3) Impact turns to the alternative

4) Alt. doesn;t solve the case

5) Link turn.  You have to remove the surveilance

6) Violence > rhetoric.  Their case turn is meaningless rhetoric, therefore the link turn is bigger than the link.

7) Perf. con.  Your other arguments link more. (specifically).  This argument depends a bit on the link, but biopower is biopower.

8) Theory/Framework

9) Case o/ws (explain)

Watch out my impact turns may have some (two for instance) may have tension with other parts.  Also, ordering the frontline differently might be helpful.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: