Skip to content
October 2, 2014 / compassioninpolitics

Reflections on affirmative and negative strategy–

Critically reading affirmatives:
• What is confusing? Dont understand part?
• Why? Best reasons?
• Best distinctions?
• Does it create a ball park? What kind of impact comparison would make sense?
• What does it set up for the 2ar?
• Weakness/holes? (from itself, case debate, analytics, arguments from the case list) Most likely to hear run against?
• Opportunities?
• Important points?
• Memorable?

Next level questions:
• How does this 2ar compare to the core strategies by negs against this aff? (politics/cp, disad/cp, critique, etc..)
• What are the next steps?
• How can this be adapted for multiple judging types? (ie new judges vs. experienced judges at various levels)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: