Skip to content
July 25, 2014 / compassioninpolitics

Answering Post-structuralism Bad Critiques

What is the nature of this critique BTW? What part of structuralism does it go after?

Who is the author or authors?

How do you connect post-modernism bad with post-structuralism bad?

1) the explanation earlier in the thread. If you make that argument….its their burden of proof to explain why its distinct and different from post-modernity.

I’m not super-deep on this area, but the fundamental worldviews and values are largely the same.

Ideally, you want a piece of evidence (probably short) to do the work for you. I might even go ahead and put it in the frontline so that its super easy to make these arguments early on…..rather than having to read it in the 1AR.

2) Explain how what the alternative does triggers the types of impacts explained in your post-modernism bad evidence. [this is something you should be doing pretty much every round on the K anyway] *****

3) Use the link debate to create impact turns for the alternative. *****

(Source: link)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: