Skip to content
December 28, 2013 / compassioninpolitics

A couple of thoughts

Ive got a weird division here–I need to work it out and separate it better:

1) Dropping, missing the point
2) Priority, comparative reasons
3) Risk and access (and credibility)
4) Warrant quality, number of warrants
5) Misunderstands the data/warrant is pointing

This is a very abstract way of looking at things. This might help on case debate type arguments or direct comparison.

Although at the moment, its a little overly simplistic. Although its possible to use it as a way to get to your common archetypal or schema,troph or patterns in arguments you use to beat the other team and WIN debates.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: