Skip to content
September 4, 2013 / compassioninpolitics

Answering Wilderson’s Afro-pessimism Critique in Policy Debate

As a quick summary:
1) Hyper-Pessimism bad
2) Afro-pessimism =’s Essentialism/Stereotyping/Hyperbole (its an overgeneralization which perpetuates racism & stereotypes)
3) Afro pessimism overdetermines reality–leaves no room for choice or change or progress.
4) History proves its wrong. The alternative turns back the clock on reform (aka the Civil Rights movement).
5) Radical identity politics bad. (Isolationism doesn’t work. Accomodationist & integrationist policies work.)
6) Their critique of civil society coopts or dooms their alternative solvency. Try or die for us. (borrowed from Claire’s lecture)

Understanding this will help you understand pretty much any identity politics argument. Or at least to be able to map or anticipate a certain part of that debate. (Note: most identity politics arguments aren’t quite this seemingly deterministic or pessimistic in nature)

You can check out these notes from Claire McKiney on answering Afro-pessimism here. There is also a 2 page thread on Cross-x.com which helps provide answers to the argument here. Moveover, I wrote a number of answers to the Home version of this argument following the finals of the NDT.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: