Skip to content
September 1, 2013 / compassioninpolitics

Anthropocentrism on the Latin American Economic Engagement Topic

Here are a couple considerations:

Link areas:
1) Economic engagement (free trade, globalization, capitalism, development, diplomacy/foreign policy/trade negotiations)
2) Advantage areas (hegemony, soft power, etc…) I would go deeper here, but I’m less familiar with the advs. this year

1) Refusing development, re-thinking development, rejecting anthropocentrism
2) Bottom up-movements/bottom-up social change (for anthro or development or from their respective literatures)

The main difference is:
1) Development as link, development good & development key to environment as link turn
2) Free trade/capitalism good as link turn (particularly the environment). For instance capitalism solves scarcity & overpopulation, etc…
3) Given the above, technology good/bad also becomes a potentially important component of the debate (not sure how often)

Haven’t sorted out how development or capitalism key to environment works from a strategic perspective. My guess is the capitalism cards are better than the development specific ones.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: