Skip to content
June 1, 2013 / compassioninpolitics

What Cards Are Most Likely To Be In A Policy Affirmative Underview?

Types of Underviews:

1. Government Good/Pragmatism/Policymaking good
• Rorty
• Boggs

2. Roleplaying Good
• Joyner/I-law case debates example

3. Reps Focus bad/Discourse bad

3. Our reps are uniquely good or our assumptions are legit (not used very often)

4. K of DA or Risk Analysis
• Rescher
• Various versions of monkey throwing darts
• Berube (Min-Max fallacy)

5. No War
• Spread of Democracy = peace
• Globalization/Interdependence
• Nuclear war impact = low

6. DA = Non-Unique
• Topic specific

You can read the full thread here.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: