Skip to content
February 10, 2013 / compassioninpolitics

Evidence comparison in policy debate–possible leverage points

SWOT

1. Priority, Purpose
2. Define (to focus or add nuance)
3. Predictive
4. Comparative (impact, data)
5. Subsumes (level of analysis)
6. data representativeness or selective (risk of data collection error)
7. depth of research & reason
8. credibility (2 levels)
9. recency (2 levels)
10. art of distinction
11. helpful framing
12. redundancy versus variety
13. logical fallacies/causal fallacies/common sense

• imagine (visualize or role play)
• assumptions (types of assumptions)
• preceptive/bias/approach

interpretive issues
spin
critical thinking
strtategic thinking ???
decision making in public policy

causality
context
credibility
comparison & contrast
clarity (optional)
distinction (?)

history
bias/motivation/intent

layers of argument pyramid
3 levels in debate (card, argument, the overall)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: